'Works for me'

This crossword clue is for the definition: 'Works for me'.
it’s A 22 letters crossword puzzle definition.
Next time, when searching for online help with your puzzle, try using the search term “'Works for me' crossword” or “'Works for me' crossword clue”. The possible answerss for 'Works for me' are listed below.

Did you find what you needed?
We hope you did!.

Possible Answers: SURE.

Last seen on: USA Today Crossword – Sep 21 2022

Random information on the term “'Works for me'”:

E, or e, is the fifth letter and the second vowel letter in the modern English alphabet and the ISO basic Latin alphabet. Its name in English is e (pronounced /ˈiː/); plural ees, Es or E’s. It is the most commonly used letter in many languages, including Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Hungarian, Latin, Latvian, Norwegian, Spanish, and Swedish.

hillul

The Latin letter ‘E’ differs little from its source, the Greek letter epsilon, ‘Ε’. This in turn comes from the Semitic letter hê, which has been suggested to have started as a praying or calling human figure (hillul ‘jubilation’), and was most likely based on a similar Egyptian hieroglyph that indicated a different pronunciation. In Semitic, the letter represented /h/ (and /e/ in foreign words); in Greek, hê became the letter epsilon, used to represent /e/. The various forms of the Old Italic script and the Latin alphabet followed this usage.

'Works for me' on Wikipedia

Random information on the term “SURE”:

In econometrics, the seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR): 306 : 279 : 332  or seemingly unrelated regression equations (SURE): 2  model, proposed by Arnold Zellner in (1962), is a generalization of a linear regression model that consists of several regression equations, each having its own dependent variable and potentially different sets of exogenous explanatory variables. Each equation is a valid linear regression on its own and can be estimated separately, which is why the system is called seemingly unrelated,: 332  although some authors suggest that the term seemingly related would be more appropriate,: 306  since the error terms are assumed to be correlated across the equations.

The model can be estimated equation-by-equation using standard ordinary least squares (OLS). Such estimates are consistent, however generally not as efficient as the SUR method, which amounts to feasible generalized least squares with a specific form of the variance-covariance matrix. Two important cases when SUR is in fact equivalent to OLS are when the error terms are in fact uncorrelated between the equations (so that they are truly unrelated) and when each equation contains exactly the same set of regressors on the right-hand-side.

SURE on Wikipedia